Analysis Of Hockey Game By Andy Warhol - 1262 Words

The image that I have chosen from Artstor, to demonstrate the understanding of the visual culture is a painting titled, â€Å"Hockey Game†. This image was created by Andy Warhol who was an American painter, printmaker and filmmaker from 1928 until 1987. There is no date on this piece. The actual size of this image is 8 by 10 inches and the material used is Gelaton silver print. Among the images found in Artstor, there is more than one image called the Hockey Game, created by the same author which are shots in time of pieces of specific hockey games. The image I choose, was of two pairs of players fighting with another player with a referee. Finding this image was achieved through the digital library Artstor, choosing all collections and†¦show more content†¦With each view having different ideologies when viewing an image, the artist in this case has left the power of his influence up to the value of the viewer. â€Å"Ideologies are produced and affirmed throug h the social institutions that characterize a given society, such as the family, education, medicine, the law, the government, the entertainment industry, among others† (p.23). As a hockey player and coach, I would view this image of a hockey fight as a natural progression of the game. If a person, ignorant to the game of hockey viewed this image, they may take offense or even be upset with the turn of events of the game. It is interesting that the there are a series of pictures called the â€Å"Hockey Game† created by Warhol, not all at the same game but showing different events of a game through this TV screen. I think the power of the series would give a viewer a much more vivid image or representation of hockey than the one specific image I choose a given instance in time. The second visual concept that will aid in the explanation of my visual analysis is the concept of realism and perception. â€Å"Art and images are in one view, a practice dedicated to the visual and material reproduction of things and events in the world. In this view, we might say that there are things in the world and then there are their representation†. (p.143). It isShow MoreRelatedThe taste of melon by borden deal11847 Words   |  48 Pagesgirls before. But I had to admit to myself that I was interested in Willadean. She was my age, nearly as tall as I, and up till the year before, Freddy Gray told me, she had been good at playing Gully Keeper and Ante-Over. But she didn’t play such games this year. She was tall and slender, and Freddy Gray and J.D. and I had several discussions about the way she walked. I maintained she was putting it on, but J.D. claimed she couldn’t help it. Freddy Gray remarked that she hadn’t walked that way

ISSUES IN PRINT MEDIA TODAY - 2674 Words

YOUR POINTS: 1. Since reading habit is decreasing, the readership base of newspapers is going down daily. As such print media, particularly newspapers are facing a crisis. 2. There is increasing competition from other means of news production and dissemination such as television, internet, mobile technology, IPADs, blogs etc. 3. People are getting news and views free from these media which provide greater immediacy as well as interaction. 4. The format of news presentation is undergoing a sea change and newspapers are virtually being squeezed out of the news space. 5. The cost of printing and distributing newspapers is going up. As such it is difficult for them to generate revenue. There is cut throat competition from other media as†¦show more content†¦It is common knowledge that pure advertisement driven media usually dives straight for the lowest common demographic. It eventually becomes the hand maiden of the advertisers, bowing to their whims and fancies. It caters to what readers want or to be more specific what the advertisers think the readers want, rather than what they need. The disconnect between ‘want’ and ‘need’ grows. Socially relevant but market unfriendly reportage becomes a casualty, robbing print media its intrinsic strength. Easy availability of more user-friendly, cost-effective, novel and networked platforms like e-book, reading material on mobile, etc. pose another problem for print media. On top of these problems, with the introduction of internet in a big way, there is a change in the very form, format and functioning of mass media. Mediated mainstream mass media is receding. There is demassification, demediation and democratization. To list the changes: †¢ Media production is being democratized †¢ Media production is being atomized †¢ Media formats are converging †¢ Media is becoming social †¢ Media can be distributed from anywhere †¢ Media can be consumed everywhere †¢ Media is becoming hyper local †¢ Media is narrowcasting †¢ Media has utility: search and linking †¢ Media reproduction has zero marginal cost The shift is towards social media. There is a distinct paradigm shift there.Show MoreRelatedPrint Media Worksheet Essay1176 Words   |  5 PagesUniversity of Phoenix Material Print Media Industry Worksheet In Parts A and B, respond to each question using complete sentences, in a paragraph of at least 100 words. Be clear and concise, and explain your answers. Cite any outside sources consistent with APA guidelines. In Part C, respond to each of the statements with a specific example or an explanation; use complete sentences as needed. Part A: Historical and contemporary role of the print media industry Choose one of theRead MoreAmerica s First National General Interest Daily Newspaper Essay951 Words   |  4 PagesUSA Today debuted in 1982 as America’s first national general-interest daily newspaper by Allen H. Gannett who was Chairman of Gannett Co., Inc., until 1989. Now this company is worth around $4.7billions and Gannett is a global information juggernaut that publishes 82 daily and 700 nondaily newspapers and affiliated websites, operates 23 broadcast television stations reaching 18.2 percent of the U.S. population. Gannett newspapers including USA Today, have combined circulation of 11.6 million readersRead MoreEssay on The Evolutionary Ladder to New Media984 Words   |  4 Pagesairwaves, newspapers and print media hung on by a thin line. However, with the introduction of new forms of media powered by the internet, Fathers do not have to wait for the morning newspaper to read the headlines. Mothers can keep up with the latest gossip, and kids can laugh away at videos online. In addition all of this information shoots across the airwaves within seconds from mobile phones and computers. Many professionals believe that traditional forms of media have had a front-row seatRead MoreThe Mass Media Has Become Apart Of Culture1068 Words   |  5 PagesDwelling in a capitalist’s society the mass media has become apart of culture. With a booming media industry, businesses are learning and habituating to incipient forms of media to promote and advertise products. In addition, print media is the first mass medium to communicate and reach an immensely colossal number of audience. We look to sundry of print media such as a magazine a somewhat reliable form of media delivering consumers with stories, opinions and visuals expr essing current events. HoweverRead MoreOral Culture Of The Late Middle Ages1468 Words   |  6 Pagesprevalence of books, magazines, and newspapers in everyday life today, it is difficult to imagine a world without print. The transition from the essentially oral culture of the late Middle Ages to the print culture of the Renaissance fundamentally changed human interaction. In Western society, the invention of the printing press and subsequent widespread literacy signaled the shift away from a primarily oral culture to a literate, print culture. Many scholars, including Plato and Harold Innis, haveRead MoreGender Biases in Sport Media Essay1229 Words   |  5 Pagesin Sport Media Introduction In today’s society, it is nearly impossible to imagine our lives without the media. Television, radio, social media, and other types of media are a big influence on our lives and we all use them on a daily basis. They give us our news, provide us with entertainment, and we base a lot of our views and beliefs off of what we see and hear in the media. The media have plenty of positive aspects; however, with the major influence they have on individuals, the media can haveRead MoreThe Impact of Media on Society Essay896 Words   |  4 PagesThroughout society, the impact of media is apparent. A quiet evening at home is often spent in front of the television or at the computer, surfing the web. One form of media whose impact has declined over the years is the print media. Originally, the most prominent form of media in society, the use of magazines, books, and newspapers have declined over the years due to the onslaught of higher technology versions. Magazines have been relegated to doctors office waiting room tables and booksRead MoreMagazines And Its Influence On Society947 Words   |  4 Pagesand Holmes. During this time magazines appealed more to the localization of people and issues. Nevertheless, magazines are still growing rapid today and has revolutionized through technologies and general interest. Some dominant economic traits today in the magazine industry are the appeal to different and various audiences. Also, some other traits are the Money-in factors which contribute to magazine sales. Today you can find a magazine that fits your interest since the decline of general-interestRead MoreSports Media Essay1063 Words   |  5 Pagesmerely competitive activities rooted in heroism and romanticism. Sports activities today, however, have no such innocence or simplicity. Currently in America, the activities that make up our sports culture is not only the competitive events themselves but the processes and issues that underlie and surround them. Entwined in our sports culture is the giant business of mass broadcasting. Indeed, sports and the media go hand in hand like peanut butter and jelly, like Mickey and Minnie, Darth Vader andRead MoreThe Effects Of Video Games On Children1034 Words   |  5 PagesThe world of today has developed in a way that even children are affected by technology. They enjoy video games in their leisure time and even prefer them to studying that, in its turn, can contribute to their poor performance in the class. These days, video games have become an issue that has brought concern to many people from parents to scholars about their potential effect on the future of children through influencing their conduct. They feel that the violent behavior or any other negative consequence

Marx on Wage and Capital Free Essays

7 PAGES 3,380 WORDS Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. [3] Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the â€Å"dictatorship of the proletariat†: a period sometimes referred to as the â€Å"workers state† or â€Å"workers’ democracy†. We will write a custom essay sample on Marx on Wage and Capital or any similar topic only for you Order Now 4][5] In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged†¦ the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes†¦. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. 6] Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change. He argued that the structural contradictions within capitalism necessitate its end, giving way to socialism: The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. —(_The Communist Manifesto_)[6] On the other hand, Marx argued that socio-economic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. He argued that capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class: â€Å"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality will have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. [7] While Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, his ideas and the ideology of Marxism began to exert a major influence on workers’ movements shortly after his death. This influence gained added impetus with the victory of the Bolsheviks in the Russian October Revolution in 1917, and few parts of the world remained significantly untouched by Marxian ideas in the course of the twentieth century. Marx is typically cited, with Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, as one of the three principal architects of modern social science. 8] Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. [3] Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the â€Å"dictatorship of the proletariat†: a period sometimes referred to as the â€Å"workers state† or â€Å"workers’ democracy†. 4][5] In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under wh ich feudal society produced and exchanged†¦ the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes†¦. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as hey overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. [6] Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change. He argued that the structural contradictions within capitalism necessitate its end, giving way to socialism: The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the b ourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. —(_The Communist Manifesto_)[6] On the other hand, Marx argued that socio-economic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. He argued that capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class: â€Å"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality will have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. [7] While Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, his ideas and the ideology of Marxism began to exert a major influence on workers’ movements shortly after his death. This influence gained added impetus with the victory of the Bolsheviks in the Russian October Revolution in 1917, and few parts of the world remained significantly untouched by Marxian ideas in the course of the twentieth century. Marx is typically cited, with Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, as one of the three principal architects of modern social science. 8] Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. [3] Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the â€Å"dictatorship of the proletariat†: a period sometimes referred to as the â€Å"workers state† or â€Å"workers’ democracy†. 4][5] In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under which feudal society produced and exchanged†¦ the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes†¦. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. 6] Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change. He argued that the structural contradictions within capitalism necessitate its end, giving way to socialism: The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. —(_The Communist Manifesto_)[6] On the other hand, Marx argued that socio-economic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. He argued that capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class: â€Å"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality will have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. [7] While Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, his ideas and the ideology of Marxism began to exert a major influence on workers’ movements shortly after his death. This influence gained added impetus with the victory of the Bolsheviks in the Russian October Revolution in 1917, and few parts of the world remained significantly untouched by Marxian ideas in the course of the twentieth century. Marx is typically cited, with Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, as one of the three principal architects of modern social science. 8] Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. [3] Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the â€Å"dictatorship of the proletariat†: a period sometimes referred to as the â€Å"workers state† or â€Å"workers’ democracy†. 4][5] In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under wh ich feudal society produced and exchanged†¦ the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes†¦. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. 6] Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change. He argued that the structural contradictions within capitalism necessitate its end, giving way to socialism: The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. —(_The Communist Manifesto_)[6] On the other hand, Marx argued that socio-economic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. He argued that capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class: â€Å"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality will have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. [7] While Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, his ideas and the ideology of Marxism began to exert a major influence on workers’ movements shortly after his death. This influence gained added impetus with the victory of the Bolsheviks in the Russian October Revolution in 1917, and few parts of the world remained significantly untouched by Marxian ideas in the course of the twentieth century. Marx is typically cited, with Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, as one of the three principal architects of modern social science. 8] Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. [3] Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the â€Å"dictatorship of the proletariat†: a period sometimes referred to as the â€Å"workers state† or â€Å"workers’ democracy†. 4][5] In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under wh ich feudal society produced and exchanged†¦ the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes†¦. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. 6] Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change. He argued that the structural contradictions within capitalism necessitate its end, giving way to socialism: The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. —(_The Communist Manifesto_)[6] On the other hand, Marx argued that socio-economic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. He argued that capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class: â€Å"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality will have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. [7] While Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, his ideas and the ideology of Marxism began to exert a major influence on workers’ movements shortly after his death. This influence gained added impetus with the victory of the Bolsheviks in the Russian October Revolution in 1917, and few parts of the world remained significantly untouched by Marxian ideas in the course of the twentieth century. Marx is typically cited, with Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, as one of the three principal architects of modern social science. 8] Marx argued that capitalism, like previous socioeconomic systems, would inevitably produce internal tensions which would lead to its destruction. [3] Just as capitalism replaced feudalism, he believed socialism would, in its turn, replace capitalism, and lead to a stateless, classless society called pure communism. This would emerge after a transitional period called the â€Å"dictatorship of the proletariat†: a period sometimes referred to as the â€Å"workers state† or â€Å"workers’ democracy†. 4][5] In section one of The Communist Manifesto Marx describes feudalism, capitalism, and the role internal social contradictions play in the historical process: We see then: the means of production and of exchange, on whose foundation the bourgeoisie built itself up, were generated in feudal society. At a certain stage in the development of these means of production and of exchange, the conditions under wh ich feudal society produced and exchanged†¦ the feudal relations of property became no longer compatible with the already developed productive forces; they became so many fetters. They had to be burst asunder; they were burst asunder. Into their place stepped free competition, accompanied by a social and political constitution adapted in it, and the economic and political sway of the bourgeois class. A similar movement is going on before our own eyes†¦. The productive forces at the disposal of society no longer tend to further the development of the conditions of bourgeois property; on the contrary, they have become too powerful for these conditions, by which they are fettered, and so soon as they overcome these fetters, they bring order into the whole of bourgeois society, endanger the existence of bourgeois property. 6] Marx argued for a systemic understanding of socio-economic change. He argued that the structural contradictions within capitalism necessitate its end, giving way to socialism: The development of Modern Industry, therefore, cuts from under its feet the very foundation on which the bourgeoisie produces and appropriates products. What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, are its own grave-diggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable. —(_The Communist Manifesto_)[6] On the other hand, Marx argued that socio-economic change occurred through organized revolutionary action. He argued that capitalism will end through the organized actions of an international working class: â€Å"Communism is for us not a state of affairs which is to be established, an ideal to which reality will have to adjust itself. We call communism the real movement which abolishes the present state of things. The conditions of this movement result from the premises now in existence. [7] While Marx remained a relatively obscure figure in his own lifetime, his ideas and the ideology of Marxism began to exert a major influence on workers’ movements shortly after his death. This influence gained added impetus with the victory of the Bolsheviks in the Russian October Revolution in 1917, and few parts of the world remained significantly untouched by Marxian ideas in the course of the twentieth century. Marx is typically cited, with Emile Durkheim and Max Weber, as one of the three principal architects of modern social science. [8] How to cite Marx on Wage and Capital, Papers

Business Policies And Argumentative Essay

Question: The School of Business has policies for grading late reports as well as reports that are plagiarized. Well review these policies and it is your responsibility to avoid the problems that go along with these two issues. Grading (or loss of grades) will be as per School of Business policy? Answer: This essay reflects upon the argumentative topic of Managing Organizational Change in the competitive Environment. This concept refers to the framework of managing inevitable changes with respect to organizational structure as well as culture. Arguments for the motion: It is a common phenomenon that with the rise of competitive environment, there has been the need for all organizations that operate in the most competitive environment to bring about some desired positive changes internally. The change management strategy includes all organizational employees to agree towards some common goals and objectives('Special Issue on Professionalization of accounting and organizational change', 2008). This enhances team work. To lead to successful changes within the organizational structure and culture, the higher authorities or the management plays key role in bringing so within the organizational environment. They are the ones responsible for motivating the organizational employees to adopt the changes in a positive manner and lay efforts in a cohesive manner for bringing about the desired changes. This improves interpersonal relationships. Organizational change is required as this enables the firm to stay competitive in the market environment (Marginson, 2009). Against the motion: Organizational change may seem to be a simple concept, but from the perspective of the organizational authorities, it is definitely a much complex mechanism. It is because many factors are deeply involved within the entire process of organizational change management. It involves lot of efforts and dedication of all team members to achieve desired objectives. Frequent organizational change does not impart proper stability and consistency to the organizational employees. References Marginson, D. (2009). Value systems as a mechanism for organizational change.J Acc Organizational Change,5(1), 7-34. doi:10.1108/18325910910932197 Special Issue on Professionalisation of accounting and organizational change. (2008).J Acc Organizational Change,4(2). doi:10.1108/jaoc.2008.31504baa.001